Armlock Putting vs. Conventional Putting: Which Method Is Best for Your Game?

Armlock Putting vs. Conventional Putting – Pros and Cons

Introduction

Putting is one of the most crucial aspects of golf, and different techniques can significantly impact a player’s performance on the greens. Two of the most debated putting styles in recent years are armlock putting and conventional putting.

While conventional putting has been the dominant method for decades, armlock putting has gained popularity among professional and amateur golfers looking for more stability and consistency in their stroke.

In this article, we will break down the pros and cons of armlock putting vs. conventional putting, examine the mechanics of each style, discuss who might benefit most from each technique, and analyze their effectiveness in competitive play.

Understanding Armlock Putting

What Is Armlock Putting?

Armlock putting is a technique that involves anchoring the grip of the putter against the lead forearm to create a more stable and consistent stroke. This method was developed as an alternative to traditional anchored putting, which was banned by the USGA and R&A in 2016.

Key Features:

• Longer putter shaft (usually 38–42 inches)
• Forward press due to loft adjustments
• Grip rests against the lead forearm to reduce wrist movement

Pros of Armlock Putting

1. Increased Stability – By anchoring the putter to the lead forearm, the stroke becomes more consistent with less hand and wrist movement.
2. Better Control Over Face Angle – The locked-in position prevents excessive rotation, leading to improved accuracy.
3. Reduced Yips – Many golfers who struggle with the yips find armlock putting to be a reliable alternative.
4. More Consistent Roll – The stroke promotes a smooth, repeatable motion, leading to better speed control.
5. Preferred by Some Tour Players – Golfers like Bryson DeChambeau and Matt Kuchar have had success using this method.

Cons of Armlock Putting

1. Adjustment Period – Transitioning from a conventional stroke requires time and practice.
2. Limited Feel – Some golfers feel they lose touch and sensitivity compared to conventional putting.
3. Equipment Requirement – Standard putters don’t work well with this method; a specialized armlock putter is required.
4. Less Effective on Fast Greens – Some players find it harder to control distance on extremely fast greens.

Understanding Conventional Putting

What Is Conventional Putting?

Conventional putting is the traditional method used by most golfers, where the putter is held with both hands in a variety of grips (e.g., reverse overlap, claw, left-hand low). The stroke is primarily controlled by the shoulders and arms, with minimal wrist movement.

Key Features:

• Standard putter length (typically 32–36 inches)

• Variety of grips available

• Freedom in stroke mechanics

Pros of Conventional Putting

1. More Natural Feel – Allows for greater touch and sensitivity, which helps in controlling distance.

2. Greater Adaptability – Can be used effectively on different green speeds and slopes.

3. No Specialized Equipment Required – Any standard putter can be used.

4. Preferred by Most Tour Players – Still the dominant method among professionals.

5. Better for Quick Adjustments – Easier to make stroke modifications during a round.

Cons of Conventional Putting

1. Prone to Wrist Breakdown – Excess wrist movement can lead to inconsistency and mis-hits.

2. More Susceptible to the Yips – Many golfers struggle with the mental and mechanical issues of short putts.

3. Requires a Steady Hand Under Pressure – Nerves can affect putts more in high-pressure situations.

4. Varied Mechanics Among Players – There is no one-size-fits-all approach, which can lead to inconsistency.

Comparing Armlock vs. Conventional Putting

Who Should Use Armlock Putting?

Best for:

• Players struggling with the yips – Reduced wrist action helps eliminate twitchy strokes.

• Golfers seeking a more repeatable stroke – Helps those who struggle with inconsistency.

• Players who like mechanical precision – Offers a scientific approach to putting.

Not Ideal for:

• Golfers who rely on feel and touch – May not provide the same delicate control as conventional putting.

• Players who switch putters frequently – Requires a specialized putter, limiting options.

• Those who play on very fast greens – Harder to control speed adjustments.

Who Should Use Conventional Putting?

Best for:

• Players who value touch and feel – Helps golfers control pace and read greens more naturally.

• Golfers comfortable with their stroke mechanics – Works well for those with stable hand movements.

• Players who frequently adjust their putting style – Greater flexibility in grip changes and stroke modifications.

Not Ideal for:

• Golfers who struggle with consistency – More prone to mis-hits and off-center strikes.

• Players prone to the yips – More wrist action can exacerbate this issue.

• Those looking for a highly structured method – More variability means less repeatability in the stroke.

Conclusion

Both armlock putting and conventional putting have their merits, and the best choice depends on the individual golfer’s preferences and needs. Armlock putting provides a more stable, repeatable stroke, making it a strong option for those struggling with consistency or the yips.

On the other hand, conventional putting offers greater touch and adaptability, making it a great fit for players who rely on feel and natural stroke mechanics.

If you’re struggling with your putting, consider experimenting with both styles to see which one suits your game best. The right method is the one that makes you more confident on the greens and helps you hole more putts!